We help you consider all areas and put together a financial plan that helps you to achieve your financial goals
Looking for Financial Advice?
Book a no obligation call with one of our experts
Avellemy commentary covering July 2021
Welcome to the post-pandemic world - in England at least.
On the 19th July the Government put phase 4 of lockdown into place. With 90% of the country's most vulnerable vaccinated, and modelling suggesting any subsequent surge in cases - particularly with schools out for the summer - would have a dramatically lower impact on hospital admissions and deaths, this was a key step in the return to 'normality'.
That said, the extreme contagiousness of the Delta variant weighed on sentiment, and the FTSE All Share index fell by over 2% on 'Freedom Day'. Businesses continued to experience supply problems, with HGV drivers in short supply as the 'pingdemic' forced over 700,000 people into isolation. June data showed that UK inflation rose to 2.5% year-on-year. However, investors who'd isolated themselves from the news at least, would have been satisfied with a 0.5% increase in the index by the end of July.
The UK is being seen by the rest of the world as a post-pandemic test case. Vaccination rates are lower elsewhere, and significantly so in some major economies eg Japan. Consequently, the spread of the Beta and Delta variants is of greater concern outside the UK. Our ability to return to normality, with supporting economic numbers and no undue pressure on the NHS, may prove to be a blueprint for other nations. One might expect our stock market to react very positively if that proves to be the case.
In the US, equities continued to ascend to test all-time highs, despite inflation rising for the fourth month in a row to almost 5.5%. This could be explained by the fact that more than 250 of the country's largest companies had reported half-year results in July and almost all had reported earnings beyond market expectations. Meanwhile 10-year Treasuries' yields continued to fall, to below 1.2%. Given such low yields, the fact that global bonds returned over 1% during the month of July alone illustrates starkly the relationship between bond yields and prices. Falling bond yields make the dividend yields on quality companies appear more attractive so it was no surprise to see global equities improve, but value companies' (where you'd expect their higher yields to be more attractive versus bonds) shares returned less that 1% while growth companies (who by definition prefer to reinvest profits rather than distribute them) rose by almost 3%, in particular in the US technology sector, although the continuing strength of sterling saw the sheen of overseas profits dulled somewhat for UK-based investors.
Yet again, size made a difference in equities closer to home, with UK and European smaller companies performing strongly, but this was not repeated in Japan nor the US. Emerging Markets were the worst affected as China's regulators clamped down on technology and private tutoring companies. A positive spin on this development is that it does appear an attempt to rebalance competition inequalities; however, re-emerging political tensions with Taiwan helped to put Chinese stocks in negative territory, with the market down over 7% during the month.
Economists are taught certain heuristics (rules of thumb to you and me). For example, when unemployment is relatively high, job vacancies will be comparatively low. High unemployment typically means bosses hold all the cards in wage negotiations, as there is consequently little upward pressure on inflation.
In the US, despite a record number of job vacancies being reported, the unemployment rate remains significantly higher than one would expect. Employers' difficulty in filling vacancies reached an all-time high earlier this year, while the number of people voluntarily quitting their jobs without another one to go to is at a similar all-time high. What is happening?
A University of Chicago survey found that 6% of workers would quit their job instantly if they were told to return to the office 5 days a week. On average, respondents expected to work from home on 10 days a month post-COVID, whereas employers typically expected to allow less than 5 days a month. Instead of wages being employees' top priority,
It may be that COVID has made profound changes in our behaviours at the microeconomic level. A desire to work from home is going to last, and is giving employees a stronger incentive to play hard, ie they can afford to be choosy about how and where they work. If firms capitulate and raise wages to accommodate such demands, then they are more likely to raise prices. Where inflation expectations are higher, those employees will bid up wages accordingly, and so on. The macroeconomic effects of COVID may prove to be fundamental but take some time to be evidenced, so again the diversification of portfolios, and regular contact with your adviser remain as important as ever.
Our Financial Advisers are available on the phone so please contact us if you have any questions.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. Investment involves risk.
The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back any of the amount originally invested. Because of this, an investor is not certain to make a profit on an investment and may lose money. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of overseas investments to rise or fall.
This communication/presentation is for information purposes only. Nothing in this communication constitutes financial, professional or investment advice or a personal recommendation. This communication should not be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction. No representation or warranty, either expressed or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained herein, nor is it intended to be a complete statement or summary of the securities, markets or developments referred to in the document. Any opinions expressed in this document are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by other business areas or companies within the same group as Ascot Lloyd as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.
This communication is issued by Capital Professional Limited, trading as Ascot Lloyd. Ground Floor Reading Bridge House, George Street, Reading, England, RG1 8LS. Capital Professional Limited is registered in England and Wales (number 07584487) and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 578614).